This guide is designed to help familiarize KUMC library users with the essential guidelines and standards for conducting and reporting Scoping Reviews (ScRs). Researchers interested in considering a scoping review should explore the critical information and resources provided in the guide while planning their review.
"Scoping reviews are a type of evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept, or issue, often irrespective of source (ie, primary research, reviews, non-empirical evidence) within or across particular contexts. Scoping reviews can clarify key concepts/definitions in the literature and identify key characteristics or factors related to a concept, including those related to methodological research." (Munn, Z. et al. 2022)
Introductory video on Scoping Reviews by JBI
Introduction and overview of Scoping Review by Munn, Z.
There are various types of reviews available in the realm of evidence synthesis. Explore the Types of Review Research Guide to know more about different kinds of reviews.
Should I conduct a Scoping Review or a Systematic Review?
A common question that arises when conducting an evidence synthesis project is whether to carry out a ScR or an SR. The following table provides an overview of the differences, helping you determine the best course of action.


